Samples of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Samples of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an aggressive campaign to gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs when it comes to Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an Indian district. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to revive self-government and control over land and resources represents a significant “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is exactly what happened once that space was recovered.

The topic of this paper addresses an understudied and period that is essential the history associated with the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a growing body of literature in the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time scale between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks because the Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the battle to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, while the community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power in the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse plus the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking community identity that is mashpee. This research examines reports that are legislative petitions, letters, and legal documents to create a narrative of Native agency into the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation therefore the Evolving Community Identity in the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to Public Places: Local Actors plus the development of National Parklands in the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and non-governmental organizations in the creation of parklands through the American South. An investigation of parklands in the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation while current historiography primarily credits the federal government with the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the significance of local and non-government sources for the preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the importance of a bureaucracy that is national the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but focus on opposition into the imposition of the latest rules governing land when confronted with some threat that is outside. Regardless of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative, the necessity of local individuals in the development of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history. Several examples when you look at the American South raise concerns in regards to the traditional narrative pitting governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained interest in both nature preservation plus in creating spaces for public recreation during the local level, and finds that the “private path to public parks” merits investigation that is further.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks within the American South” was subsequently selected for publication when you look at the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced an abundant literature in regards to the Levellers and their role into the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily centered on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to increase the espousal and franchise of a theory of popular sovereignty happens to be central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a sect that is fragmented of radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they will make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to locate a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their religious ideas. As opposed to centering on John Lilburne, often taken given that public face associated with the Leveller movement, this paper will concentrate on the equally interesting and a lot more consistent thinker, William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement into the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, I hope to declare that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism in the face of violent sectarians who sought to wield control of the Church of England. Even though the Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s dedication to a society that is tolerant a secular state shouldn’t be minimized but instead seen as element of a more substantial debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to donate to the rich historiography of religious toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: A Case Study associated with First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have not only proliferated rapidly–they have grown to be the normative expectation within American society. When it comes to great majority of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have led to no permanent memory sites in addition to sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the city while the nation could forget the tragedy and move on. This all changed on May 29, 1989 when the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial into the thirteen people killed in the”post that is infamous shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the case of Edmond to be able to realize why it became the memory that is first with this kind in united states of america history. I argue that the tiny town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time for the shooting, coupled with the total that is near involvement established ideal conditions for the emergence with this unique type of memory site. I also conduct a historiography of the use of “the ribbon” in order to illustrate how this has become the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society in the late 20th century. Lastly, I illustrate the way how do you do your homework the lack that is notable of between people mixed up in Edmond and Oklahoma City cases following the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity among these cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising quantity of aesthetic similarities that these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The pursuit of Postmortem Identity through the Pax Romana”

“If you’d like to know who i will be, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription. The Romans dealt with death in lots of ways which incorporated a range of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as in the full case of the “ash and embers.” The romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained by the turn of the first century of this era. Cremation vanished by the third century, replaced by the practice regarding the distant past by the century that is fifth. Burial first began to take hold when you look at the western Roman Empire throughout the early second century, aided by the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites from the Roman world would not discuss the practices of cremation and burial in more detail. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in as a type of burial vessels such as for example urns and sarcophagi represented the sole spot to check out investigate the transitional to inhumation in the world that is roman. This paper analyzed a tiny corpus of such vessels to be able to identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of these symbols into the fragments of text available relating to death within the world that is roman. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement caused by a heightened desire from the right part of Romans to preserve identity in death during and following the Pax Romana.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *